8.4 Retargetting for other Processors

Next: 9. Compiler internals Up: 8. SDCC Technical Data Previous: 8.3 Cyclomatic Complexity Contents Index

# 8.4 Retargetting for other Processors

The issues for retargetting the compiler are far too numerous to be covered by this document. What follows is a brief description of each of the seven phases of the compiler and its MCU dependency.

- Parsing the source and building the annotated parse tree. This phase is largely MCU independent (except for the language extensions). Syntax & semantic checks are also done in this phase, along with some initial optimizations like back patching labels and the pattern matching optimizations like bit-rotation etc.
- The second phase involves generating an intermediate code which can be easy manipulated during the later phases. This phase is entirely MCU independent. The intermediate code generation assumes the target machine has unlimited number of registers, and designates them with the name iTemp. The compiler can be made to dump a human readable form of the code generated by using the --dumpraw option.
- This phase does the bulk of the standard optimizations and is also MCU independent. This phase can be broken down into several sub-phases:
  Break down intermediate code (iCode) into basic blocks.
  Do control flow & data flow analysis on the basic blocks.
  Do local common subexpression elimination, then global subexpression elimination
  Dead code elimination
  Loop optimizations
  If loop optimizations caused any changes then do 'global subexpression elimination' and 'dead code elimination' again.
- This phase determines the live-ranges; by live range I mean those iTemp variables defined by the compiler that still survive after all the optimizations. Live range analysis is essential for register allocation, since these computation determines which of these iTemps will be assigned to registers, and for how long.
- Phase five is register allocation. There are two parts to this process.
  The first part I call 'register packing' (for lack of a better term). In this case several MCU specific expression folding is done to reduce register pressure.
  The second part is more MCU independent and deals with allocating registers to the remaining live ranges. A lot of MCU specific code does creep into this phase because of the limited number of index registers available in the 8051.
- The Code generation phase is (unhappily), entirely MCU dependent and very little (if any at all) of this code can be reused for other MCU. However the scheme for allocating a homogenized assembler operand for each iCode operand may be reused.
- As mentioned in the optimization section the peep-hole optimizer is rule based system, which can reprogrammed for other MCUs.

More information is available on SDCC Wiki (preliminary link http://sdcc.wiki.sourceforge.net/SDCC+internals+and+porting) and in the thread http://sf.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13954144 .

Next: 9. Compiler internals Up: 8. SDCC Technical Data Previous: 8.3 Cyclomatic Complexity Contents Index